Showing posts with label Ministry of external affairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ministry of external affairs. Show all posts

Thursday, January 10, 2013

The unending battle

At the stroke of the midnight hour when the world was sleeping, India was divided into two countries based on religion. What followed was an orgy of hate, riots, arson, rape and murder. Communal tensions started brewing much before the actual date of partition. The days following 15th August were the most dreadful. An estimated 10 million people migrated between India and Pakistan (many locked their homes believing they will return once the matter cools down) making it the largest mass migration in human history. The violence that engulfed large part of northern and eastern India during those few months lead to many deaths. Official records were scarce but estimates put the number to around a million. India and Pakistan never managed to reconcile.

Who can kick harder?
Four wars have been fought between India and Pakistan and border skirmishes are common. Though there is an agreed ceasefire between the two countries the troops regularly exchange fire. People to people contact on both sides of the border is scarce and there is a deep trust deficit. Regular export of terrorism by Pakistan since the early 90s has not helped the matter at all. The army of Pakistan which also acts as capitalist force (Pakistani armed force controls a USD 10 billion business empire manufacturing everything from fertilizers to breakfast cereals) has successfully managed to keep the fear psychosis alive in Pakistan. The defense budget of Pakistan for fiscal year 2012-13 is PKR 800 billion (USD 8.21 billion) 28% of the total budget spending.

The line between politics and armed forces in Pakistan is so blurred that the election commission wants the army to supervise the elections later this year. The election commission has also ordered verification of electoral rolls to be carried out under supervision of the army. No one knows for sure who between the army and the civilian government rules the state. This is one of the biggest problems when it comes to negotiating peace with Pakistan. The Pakistani army is interested in keeping the fire burning. If in the coming decades the relationship between India and Pakistan normalize there will be a heavy reduction in defense spending and the army will be sent back to the barracks. Obviously they do not want to be sidelined.

The civilian governments of Pakistan tried in the past to patch up with India (once even a general after staging a coup got talking to India) but their military always betrayed them. The recent violation of cease fire in Kashmir is one such example. Two Indian soldiers were killed and their bodies mutilated by the Pakistani troops in an ambush. Meanwhile Pakistan is claiming that Indian troops shot down one of their soldiers. Such news acts as fodder for the jingoists on both sides of the border. Many Indians want a “final” war on Pakistan, some want it to be nuked, some sane types prefer surgical strikes and almost every one firmly agrees that the government is spineless.

From similar experiences around the world we know that a “final” war does not exist, nukes are at best deterrents and military strikes have not wiped out Taliban in Afghanistan even after ten years. Is there a solution to this unending battle? No one knows. There will have to be many changes on both sides of the border. More on the Pakistani side than on the Indian. Political situation in Pakistan has to stabilize, its home grown and military financed terror networks have to be disbanded and honest textbooks should replace the present anti India ones. All this might never happen or at best take many decades. India cannot and should not wait for the right moment to arrive.

India is yet to harness its growing power on the international high table. Ministry of external affair finds it difficult to manage the various stakeholders at once. Severe staff shortage and misplaced foreign policies have made India a dwarf in the international arena. Till 9/11 the western world saw the India – Pakistan relationship from the Pakistani point of view. Aggressive diplomacy and friendly relationship with the US helped Pakistan a lot. India’s repeated allegation of state sponsored terrorism by Pakistan fell on deaf ears.

With no solution in sight, India should embark upon a two prong long term strategy. First is to engage into aggressive diplomacy and second to engage with Pakistan at multiple levels. The international community has finally recognized the issue of Pakistan and its terror networks. Post 2014 when the American forces move out the interest in Pakistan too will diminish. India should be worried about such a situation. This is the time when it should engage in a high level dialogue with not just America but also with other stakeholders like China and Turkey. India should also turn out as a matured democracy in the UN. As an aspirant of a permanent seat on the Security Council it should demonstrate its willingness to engage in world matters than abstaining on matters of world interest in a vote.

Engagement with Pakistan is a necessity. One cannot wish away its neighbours. The current level of engagement is a good step forward. But this can only happen if Pakistan plays ball. 


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Sri Lanka in a corner


The bloody civil war, which ravaged Sri Lanka for twenty five long years, came to an end in May 2009. However the battle of survival for the Tamils still continues in the island nation. There are no credible statistics to prove how many people were killed in the long civil war. Estimates put the numbers between 80,000 to 100,000 out of which close to 8,000 were killed in the final days of the war in May 2009. The dead include the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) insurgents and civilians. Millions of ethnic Tamils are still displaced and living in temporary shelters. The Sri Lankan army is accused of war crimes by the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC). On 23rd March the UN body plans to move a resolution condemning the war crimes by Sri Lankan army.

Let me do some thinking. Again

The ministry of foreign affairs of India is in its usual state of flux. Newspaper reports suggest that the India wants to adopt the wait and watch approach. It does not want to comment without reading the text of the resolution. Parliamentarians from the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu (who share ethnic links with the Sri Lankan Tamils) disrupted parliamentary proceedings on the government’s non committal gesture. Most of the shouting done by Tamil parliamentarians is for their electoral audience, but the government of India cannot ignore it. One of the Tamil political parties (DMK) is a major coalition partner in the ruling UPA government. The fortunes of DMK have sunk in the past state elections but nevertheless it holds 18 seats and is crucial for the survival of the government.

India’s policy of non interference into matters of other countries is used as an alibi. To make matters worse this is a case of insurgency, which haunts India in Jammu & Kashmir and some north eastern states. Supporting the Tamil cause would mean supporting separatist insurgency, something that India clearly does not want. Supporting the Sri Lankan government will pull India down from its self perceived high moral ground. It is not surprising at all that India is finding hard to take a call on the sensitive issue. But its time India takes a pragmatic approach to the situation.

For nobody but yourself

Monks protesting against the UN resolution in Colombo
India should use its influence on Sri Lanka to make Mr Rajapakse understand the follies of being in deliberate denial. The massacre by the Lankan army in the final days of the civil war is a reality. There are many cases with credible evidence (according to the reports of the UN delegation in Sri Lanka and the government’s self appointed Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission or LLRC) of war crimes. Notorious “white vans” roam the streets of Sri Lanka to abduct protestors who raise voice against the president. Most of the people abducted were later found murdered and their bodies abandoned. Reconciliation and rehabilitation of the displaced Tamils has sadly stayed on paper with little to show to the international community. There is a clear lack of genuine efforts by Mr Rajapakse to assimilate Tamils into the mainstream.

India should make sure Sri Lanka shows credible and sustainable efforts to investigate the war crimes. Taking the “white vans” off the streets should be the first step. Abducted protestors who are missing and if still alive should be released. Humanitarian assistance offered by India should be made available to the Tamils and the reconciliation process should be pursued with the same excitement as shown in the final days of the war in 2009. An honest effort by the president will have far reaching impact on the present situation of the country. A disgruntled population is a sitting tinderbox, waiting for the spark.