The poor cousin
The year 2011 marked thirty years*
of existence of SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation). After
all these years, SAARC has little to show to its flourishing cousins like the
ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) or the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation
Organization). Both regional associations have transformed themselves into
globally respected trade blocs and are far more active compared to their South
Asian cousin. SAARC on the other hand has proved no more than an alternate (and
perhaps less controversial) venue for Indian and Pakistani ministers and
bureaucrats to talk. So what really went wrong?
Partly the timing of the
association is to be blamed. The idea was mooted in late 70s by Sheikh Mujibur
Rehman, the first Prime Minister of Bangladesh. However, the formal
incorporation of the association did not happen till 1981, when the heads of
the states of seven countries (Afghanistan
joined in 2007) met in Colombo .
This was the time when India
witnessed a tide of insurgency in Punjab which
later transformed into a full blown terrorist movement. The insurgency in Punjab was followed by a similar unrest in the northern
most Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir. India
blamed Pakistan
for the terrorist activities in both the states. India ’s
involvement in Sri Lanka ’s
civil war and the subsequent fall out was another reason for India to go
slow on SAARC. Domestic politics in the respective countries prevented them
from actively engaging in trade dialogues with India .
As a result intra SAARC relationship
went into a deep freeze even before it could mature into a meaningful dialogue.
The very fact that the SAARC has barely met for sixteen times during its thirty
years of existence is a proof of it being neglected by the member states.
Meanwhile India, the largest member in terms of population, size and economy
was looking at off shore forums like the ASEAN and SCO where domestic politics
played little role and economic dividends were substantial. Regional politics
had taken its toll, reducing SAARC to the status of a poor cousin among the Asian
trade blocs.
Spring cleaning
Much has changed in the past
couple of years, especially on the security front. The twenty six year old
civil war in Sri Lanka has come to an end, militancy in the Indian state of
Punjab has faded away from public memory, Jammu & Kashmir is witnessing
lowest level of terrorist activities in two decades and India – Bangladesh are
making tremendous progress to mend their relationships. However, Pakistan is
still shrouded by the war against terrorism and its complex domestic politics.
It will be some time before Pakistan
returns on the path of growth.
Time has come when India should
take the initiative to resurrect SAARC. According to 2009 estimates the SAARC
region has a total population of 1.6 billion in an area of 5.1 million sq km
and the total GDP amounts to USD 4.3 trillion (PPP). These statistics are
exciting for any organisation looking at a business venture in the region.
Sadly intra SAARC trade reached USD 687 million in 2009, a fraction of its
global trade. On the other hand other regional organisation registered
significantly high trade volumes among their member countries. ASEAN registered
total intra regional trade to the tune of USD 387 billion in 2009 and SCO
registered USD 8.4 billion in 2010. For a region which accounts for almost a
quarter of the global population, the trade figures come as a shame. The
proposed India – Bangladesh
transit agreement will be a major step towards cleaning the mess hindering
SAARC integration.
The extra mile
Will SAARC move beyond a photo opportunity? |
Various global agencies including
the European Union, Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, etc and countries
like the United States
show active interest in SAARC. These organisations publish working papers &
statistical analysis to gauge the progress. However, the real job has to be
done by the member countries. India
being the largest country in the region should walk that extra mile to revive
SAARC. Other SAARC members too should shed their inhibitions and take some bold
steps (as Bangladesh has
taken) to address concerns of India
and enter into a relationship on equal footing.
SAARC needs a giant step forward.
That would mean significant changes in current tariff regulations. Despite
SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area) being in force since 2006, no substantial
trade movements have happened with in the region (though intra SAARC trade
jumped from USD 14 million to USD 687 million in 2009, it still remains dwarfed
by its rivals like ASEAN and SCO). The member countries fail to understand the
benefits of a real free trade area where goods and services can be exchanged
without tariff or non tariff barriers. Such arrangements have immensely helped
countries of ASEAN. India
as a country too benefited from liberalisation of its economy. These are living
examples of modern day economies harnessing benefits of increasingly globalised
trade.
Lesson should be learnt from India – Bangladesh
transit agreement which will help not just India
but Bangladesh , Nepal and Bhutan to better their
international trade by using Indian and Bangladeshi roads and ports. Physical
integration of infrastructure of the region will pave way for smooth transit of
goods across borders and will save time and wastage during transit. The
challenge will be to integrate the two unstable western members in the folds of
SAARC.
*The foreign secretaries of the
seven founding countries met in 1981 in Colombo ,
Sri Lanka for
the first time